Alert to readers: Amazon.com displays listings for several more workbooks, study guides, and cookbooks purportedly based on my book, What to Eat Now (see previous post on this).  I did not write any of them.  Caveat emptor!

___________________________

From FoodDive: How MAHA transformed the food industry in 2025:  Lawmakers capitalized on anxieties around ultraprocessed ingredients to introduce new regulations, with companies choosing to reformulate or fight back.

To summarize:

• Artificial food dyes: food companies voluntarily said they would get rid of them by the end of 2026 or 2027.  Will they?  We shall see.
• Ultra-processed foods: The first MAHA report mentioned them 40 times.  By the second, the only issue was to define them, and RFK Jr said they might not even do that.
• GRAS loophole: The FDA says it will require better evidence of safety before allowing new additives in food.
• Seed oils: some food companies are replacing them with beef tallow or avocado oil.  How will this affect health?  It depends on the quality of the replacement.
• High fructose corn syrup: Coca-Cola said it would replace it with cane sugar, no doubt at higher cost.  Since both sweeteners have the same sugars and calories, this switch is unlikely to make any difference to health.
• School food: Whole milk is back.  Will this help children maintain healthy weight?  We shall see.
• SNAP: 18 states are restricting sodas (some also restrict candy or desserts) from purchases using SNAP benefits.  Will this encourage SNAP recipients to buy less soda?  I hope states will collect data on this and other points.
• Dietary guidelines: They are expected next week.  We shall see.

The food industry’s response?

• Go along with this if it doesn’t affect the bottom line.
• Fight back if it does.  And sue states if it really does.

So far, most of what is happening in the food arena is either still in the promise stage, voluntary, and unlikely to have much health benefit (See: A MAHA Check-Up: Is The United States Getting Healthier?)

All of what is happening with food must be understood in the context of the devastating destruction of America’s public health and scientific research systems.

MAHA’s work is focused on the dietary choices of individuals.

Any individual who tries to make healthful dietary choices is up against a food system designed for profit, not public health.

Diet matters to health, but healthy diets are not enough to prevent measles.

We need functioning public health systems: CDC, FDA, NIH.  We no longer have them.

Happy new year everyone.  Let’s hope the new year brings us peace, kindness, and public health.

My new book, What to Eat Now: The Indispensible Guide to Good Food, How to Find It, and Why It Matters, came out a few weeks ago and I am stunned by how it is being AI-used by exploiters.

I’ve already written about the DeepFake books supposedly inspired by What to Eat Now, which I had nothing to do with.  And I have been alerting readers to even more workbooks, study guides, and cookbooks.

Now I’m also having to deal with DeepFake book club offers.

Every week since the book was published, I get several incredibly flattering letters like these:

Hi Marion,

When I came across What to Eat Now: The Indispensable Guide to Good Food, How to Find It, and Why It Matters, I felt that spark you only get when a book arrives exactly when the world needs it most. In an era swirling with misinformation, techno-food innovations, and thirty-thousand-item supermarket aisles, your voice cuts through the noise with clarity, courage, and wit.

I’m Emily A., curator of The San Francisco “Not Quite a Book Club” a vibrant circle of 4,369 readers who don’t gather to simply discuss books, but to rethink the assumptions shaping our daily lives. We’re known for choosing titles that push conversations forward, and your thoroughly revised, deeply relevant guide does precisely that.

What struck me most about What to Eat Now is how seamlessly it blends field guide, exposé, and empowering manifesto. You don’t just tell people what to eat, you reveal the hidden architecture of our food system, the psychology of our choices, and the quiet politics influencing every item in our baskets. It’s the kind of work that wakes readers up, sparks debate, and shifts lifelong habits.

Our readers are drawn to books that matter, books that help them look at something ordinary with extraordinary new eyes. What to Eat Now is exactly that kind of catalyst…If this feels like a collaboration you’d enjoy, I’d be thrilled to walk you through the simple next steps.

Thank you for offering a clear, honest, and necessary compass in a world where so many feel lost in the grocery store.

Warm regards,

Wow!  How could I possibly not jump at this opportunity to share my work with more than 4,000 readers.

Here’s one more to give you the idea of how this works:

Dear Marion Nestle,

I am honored to invite you to participate in our upcoming community virtual event, celebrating founding figures in food studies and authors who empower citizens to navigate the complex landscape of modern nutrition.

For over two decades, your work has served as the “clear-eyed” conscience of the American food system. Your latest release, What to Eat Now, arrives at a critical juncture. In an era of “techno foods,” corporate organics, and pervasive misinformation, our community is eager for the no-nonsense, aisle-by-aisle guidance that only you can provide.

We are particularly interested in hosting a discussion around the vital themes of your revised classic…Your reputation as America’s preeminent nutritionist makes you a highly anticipated guest for our audience. We would be privileged to provide a platform for you to share your wit and common sense with a community that values food not just as fuel, but as a pillar of community and ethics.

Please note that an organization fee applies to support the event’s planning and outreach.

Well, at least that’s disclosed.

And on and on such letters go, each more flattering than the last.  And so many of them!

Fortunately, I’m supposed to be checking all offers with my publisher, Macmillan (Macmillan owns Farrar, Straus & Giroux, which owns North Point Press).  That’s how I learned about The New “Book Club” Scam Targeting Authors and How to Spot It.

They claim unusually large membership numbers.Real book clubs typically have: 6–12 regulars (in person), or 20–50 active members (online). Claims of 500–5,000 active readers aren’t impossible, just unlikely.

They ask for money at some point.This is the core red flag. Legitimate book clubs do not charge authors to participate or be featured. Sometimes they even pay the author, if the event is big enough.

They resist sharing any verifiable details.A real organizer can: tell you where the group meets, provide a link to a group page, share photos or past events, name members, or offer references from other authors. A scammer cannot.

I’m as subject to flattery as anyone else is and I can’t help wanting to know: Is there actually a book club at the end of all this?  I’m so tempted to pursue one of these and see.

Also, I’ve been collecting the DeepFake books with my name on the cover.  I have eight (!) so far—workbooks, study guides, and cookbooks.  I will report on them sometime in January.

In the meantime, caveat emptor!

Alert to readers: Amazon.com displays listings for several more workbooks, study guides, and cookbooks purportedly based on my book, What to Eat Now (see previous post on this).  I did not write any of them.  Caveat emptor!

___________________________

Thanks to Lais Miachon Silva of the Micronutrient Forum for sending this item.

The study: A Systematic Review of Nonsugar Sweeteners and Cancer Epidemiology Studies. Advances in Nutrition Volume 16, Issue 12, December 2025, 100527.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100527

Methods: systematic literature review

Results: “We found no consistent associations between any NSS or NSSs in aggregate and any cancer overall, and no evidence for dose–response.”

Conclusions: “Experimental animal and mechanistic evidence for NSSs does not support human-relevant carcinogenicity or any biologically plausible mechanisms by which NSSs could cause genotoxicity or cancer in humans. Overall, the epidemiology evidence does not support associations between any NSS and any cancer type.”

Funding: ABA [American Beverage Association] provided funding for this paper, which was written during the authors’ normal course of employment.

Conflict of interest: All authors are employed by Gradient, Geosyntec, or the American Beverage Association (ABA). Gradient and Geosyntec are environmental and risk sciences consulting firms. ABA is the trade association that represents America’s non-alcoholic beverage industry. ABA provided funding for this paper, which was written during the authors’ normal course of employment. This paper represents the professional opinions of the authors and not those of ABA.

Comment: This is a classic example of an industry-funded study conducted by industry employees producing results favorable to the sponsor’s commercial interests.  I am particularly amused by the last conflict of interest statement.  It too is a classic example, this time of Upton Sinclair’s famous quote: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.” 

Alert to readers: Amazon.com displays listings for several more workbooks, study guides, and cookbooks purportedly based on my book, What to Eat Now (see previous post on this).  I did not write any of them.  Caveat emptor!

___________________________

I’ve been collecting items on the effects of GLP-1 drugs on the food industry.

Recall my mantra: Eating less is bad for business.

These drugs are a threat to the food industry.  Here’s how it is responding.

• New research from Chemi Nutra highlights how GLP-1 users want to maintain the benefits of the medication while feeling like their former selves, revealing a significant gap in addressing the broader physiological and psychological impacts of weight loss meds…. Listen now
• The GLP-1 effect: How 2026 will look for food and beverage:  From shifting grocery habits to new product opportunities, Circana’s insights reveal how brands and retailers can adapt to the rise of GLP-1 users… Listen now
• GLP-1: Threat or opportunity for food manufacturers?  At this early stage in the market, not all manufacturers know how to respond… Read more  
• GLP-1 adoption is rising steadily – and reshaping pack size, portfolio strategy and volume.  Rising GLP-1 adoption is quietly reshaping pack size strategy, category risk and marketing priorities for food and beverage brands… Read more  
• Five ways GLP-1 drugs are shaping the beverage industry:  Soda sales are taking a hit; but functional beverages are booming… Read more
• GLP-1 has changed the snack game: Here’s how to win it back:  GLP-1 users are rewriting the rules of appetite, texture and indulgence. Tate & Lyle’s latest research shows exactly where producers are missing the moment… Read more
• Could functional foods replace the need for GLP-1s?  As GLP-1 drugs disrupt the weight loss market, food and beverage players are racing to unlock the appetite-regulating power of functional ingredients… Read more

May your holidays be filled with family, friends, loving kindness—and cookies!

Alert to readers: Amazon.com displays listings for several more workbooks, study guides, and cookbooks purportedly based on my book, What to Eat Now (see previous post on this).  I did not write any of them.  Caveat emptor!

________________________

I can hardly get my head around this.

Here is USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins doing a version of the dairy industry’s milk mustache campaign celebrating the reintroduction of whole milk into schools.

Our otherwise dysfunctional Congress has managed to pass a bipartisan bill, “The Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2025.”

The bill overturns previous restrictions on whole-fat milk and dairy alternative milks in schools.  Now:

I.  Schools may offer students dairy milks—or nutritionally equivalent non-dairy beverages 

• flavored (e.g., chocolate) and unflavored
• organic or nonorganic
• reduced fat, low-fat, and fat-free
• lactose-free

II.  Milk fat will not count as saturated fat in rules about saturated fat limits

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is happy about the the non-dairy alternatives.

But this has to be counted as a clear win for the dairy industry, desperate to get whole and flavored milks back into schools.

The rationale?

How will doing this make kids healthier?

Here is my milk summary table from What to Eat Now.

And this is before the chocolate and sugar get tossed in.

How much difference will it make to kids’ overall calorie and saturated fat intake?  My guess: probably not much.

Here are my immediate questions:

• How many different kinds of milk, dairy and not, can schools logistically manage to store and serve?
• Will kids drink more milk now?
• Will they choose whole over skim?
• Will they choose chocolate whole milk over chocolate skim?
• Will they choose plant-based alternatives?

Note: all of these are about the selling of milk, not health.

That’s because this is not a health initiative; it is a dairy promotion initiative.

Alert to readers: Amazon.com displays listings for several more workbooks, study guides, and cookbooks purportedly based on my book, What to Eat Now (see previous post on this).  I did not write any of them.  Caveat emptor!

___________________________

As I keep saying, food companies are not social service or public health agencies.  They are businesses with stockholders to please and pleasing stockholders is their first priority.

Even so, I am occasionally still shocked by business practices.

Here’s one: Same Product, Same Store, but on Instacart, Prices Might Differ

The shoppers were volunteers, participating in a study published on Tuesday and organized by the Groundwork Collaborative, a progressive policy group, and Consumer Reports, a nonprofit consumer publication. In tests in four cities across the country, nearly 200 volunteers checked prices on 20 grocery items on Instacart.

Alert to readers: Amazon.com displays listings for several more workbooks, study guides, and cookbooks purportedly based on my book, What to Eat Now (see previous post on this).  I did not write any of them.  Caveat emptor!

___________________________

Thanks to Erin Croom from Small Bites Adventure Club! for sending this one.

• The Study: The Sweet Tooth Trial: A Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Effects of A 6-Month Low, Regular, or High Dietary Sweet Taste Exposure on Sweet Taste Liking, and Various Outcomes Related to Food Intake and Weight Status. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Available online 27 November 2025, 101073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.09.041
• Methods: The investigators gave 180 healthy adults dietary advice plus about half their calories from meals containing 7%, 35%, or 80% food and beverages sweetened with sugars or artificial sweeteners.
• Results: no differences in sweet taste liking or perception or sweet food choice.
• Conclusions: “In the current trial, altering exposure to sweet-tasting foods did not change sweet taste liking, nor other outcomes. These results do not support public health advice to reduce exposure to sweet-tasting foods, independent of other relevant factors such as energy density and food form.“
• Funding: “The sweet tooth project…also received private contributions from: American Beverage Association, Apura Ingredients, Arla Foods amba, Cargill R&D Centre Europe BVBA, Cosun Nutrition Center, DSM-Firmenich, International Sweeteners Association, SinoSweet Co., Ltd., and Unilever Foods Innovation Centre Wageningen.”
• Conflict of interest: “MM has previously received research funding from Royal Cosun (sugar beet refinery) and Sensus (inulin producer) and has received expenses from ILSI Europe. MB has received research funding from Horizon 2020 SWEET…KMA has previously received research funding from the International Sweeteners Association, BE, and has current funding from The Coca Cola Company, US, and Ajinomoto Health and Nutrition North America Inc. US; KMA has received speaker’s expenses from EatWell Global and PepsiCo. KdG is a member of the Global Nutrition Advisory Board of Mars company. KdG has received travel, hotel, and speaker renumeration from the International Sweeteners Association, and received speaker expenses from ILSI North America.”

Comment: The point of all this was to demonstrate that public health recommendations to reduce sugar intake in order to reduce the taste for sugar won’t do any good, so why bother.  To restate the obvious: sugars have calories but no nutrients, and taking in a lot of them at once—as in soft drinks—messes up metabolism and is best avoided.  Eating less of sugary foods and drinks is always a good idea.  But, as I am always pointing out, eating less is bad for business.  Hence this study.